The Rayong Admin Court said in their January 16, 2008 Order “Court is of the opinion that if the measurement was made from the building control area shown in the map”
Then later on March 31, 2009 the Rayong Admin Court announced in their decisions the a new claim which can’t be found write it the regulation. The Rayong court claim “the Construction Control Line along the Sea Side is fixed by fixing the Sea Shore at MSL as well and fixed the Construction Control Line, along the Sea Shore to be the Line measured from the Sea Shore at MSL outward into the sea for 100 meters.” This court statement is not logical because it claims two possession of the CCL. One CCL at “Sea Shore at MSL and a second “from the Sea Shore at MSL outward into the sea for 100 meters”. I found this remark incredible, mind-boggling and AMAZING!
Or does the Supreme Administrative Court decision of July 2007 make since? It said Issue 9 “prescribed that the 200 meters line measured from the construction control line shown in the map”.
Which court do you think understood what Issue 9 states. Issue 9: “No 3. Setting of 200 meters measured from the construction control line see the map…….. at the seaside ……" The imputation of this phrase is the heart on the case. Read below our Appeal with the newly posted City Hall and VT7 reply.
